| In a scandalously acclaimed letter Alexander Blok - poet, critic, and a core member of the Russian Symbolist movement - writes:
"Art is cosmos, and only cosmos - that is, the creative spirit that shapes chaos (which is our spiritual and physical world)… Our greatest writers (specifically Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky) build everything upon this chaos (such was their way of "appreciating" it), and as a result they came up with the exponential chaos, and therefore they were bad artists."2
Blok's criticism of the two literary giants is neither snobbism nor heresy. While admiring their work, Blok condemns the chaotic flow of their thought and the lack of form and shape of their novels. He is bothered by the moments of genius that float astray in the mire of mundane descriptions. Himself a devoted sonneteer, Blok was influenced by Théophile Gautier, leader of French Parnassians and a figure of crucial importance to French and Russian Symbolists. In his collection of verse Emaux et Camées, Gauitier promoted the Form as the ultimate aspiration for any writer:
The form, I say, is the feast for our eyes!
Be it filled with water or exquisite wine,
Carafe lures us in with its beauty. The refined
Aromas fade, while the vessel stays.
Gautier's hefty proclamation poses a fundamental question of writing: can art be constrained by any sort of a form - be it a literary device, logic, or belief system? When artist channels pure sincerity of emotion or the raging flow of thought, identity and learning experiences always come into focus. Are these forms a burden, precious embellishment, or vital tool?
An interesting insight into this dilemma stems from the works of Andre Breton. In Manifeste du Surrealisme3 , Breton defined Surrealism as:
"pure psychic automatism, by which an attempt is made to express, either verbally, in writing or in any other manner, the true functioning of thought. The dictation of thought, in the absence of all control by the reason, excluding any aesthetic or moral preoccupation."
The aim of Automatic Writing, Dada and Surrealism had become the complete release of the subconscious mind flow, freed from barriers erected by society, background, mood, etc. However, only six years later, in the Second Manifesto of Surrealism, Andre Breton realized that without any control automatic writing becomes consistently incoherent, boring, and repetitive. His reinstated goal has become the idea "to use the unconscious as inspiration and then control it and manipulate it using reason."
Seemingly, on the opposite extreme from the concept of automatic writing, appear teachings of Basho, seventeenth's century Japanese master of haiku. Haiku is known for its extreme strictness of form - it is a three-line poem with a 5-7-5 syllabic structure. And yet, Basho writes:
"Composition must occur at an instant, like a woodcutter felling a huge tree, or a swordsman leaping at his enemy."4
Surprisingly, we see a concept very similar to that of Breton's - a haiku ought to be created in a single breath, and most preferably stay so, unaltered. The original goal of writing a haiku is not to perform acrobatics within the 5-7-5 format, but to capture the momentary flash of an insight into understanding of the universe and to channel it through a particular format.
Obviously, the nature of our question is not exclusive to art alone. We are at the same battlefield, where unreasonable intuition locks horns with well-defined shapes of logic, feelings contradict knowledge, and the unruly freedom opposes limits of structure.
Here's what Rabbi Meir Ben Gabbai, author of Avodat Hakodesh5 concludes regarding this multi-faceted dichotomy:
Veim taamar she'yeish lo koach b'li gvul' vein lo koach b'gvul'
ata mehaser meshleymuso6
From the divine perspective, both chaos and limits are one. Therefore, what we are accustomed to perceiving as true freedom from limits can only be found within the constraints of limits. Limitlessness - the ultimate freedom we desire - can never really exist on its own: it's incomplete, because it's lacking the limits, while within limits, we can find the true freedom, because that's where we see that limitless and limits coexist - as one.
Similarly, a Mishna in the Pirkey Avot7 says in reference to writing of Ten Commandments upon the Tablets:
"Don't read engraved (harut), but freedom (herut)."
Rabbi Yehoshua Ben Levy, author of this Mishna, teaches that real freedom lies within the words of the formulated Law; understanding of that freedom is engraved into the shapes of the ancient letters.
In his interview with Mima'amakim, Rabbi Laibl Wolf8 extrapolates the teachings of the Ba'al Tanya9 who presents an ancient Kabbalistic theory stating that we extract the sparks of inspiration from the flow of Chochmah, originating in moach setumah - the hidden mind - the subconscious. Impregnated by this inspiration, we nourish it in Binah (understanding), as if in a vessel of logic, and thus gain Da'at, the knowing. The biblical word used for sexual intimacy is also daat, as it says veadam yada as hava ishto10. In the moments of ethereal intimacy, bits of the infinite enter the mold of our being, turning incompleteness of chaos into the holistic infinity within our limits, turning inspiration into the work of art.
This issue of Mima'amakim - a gallery of inspiration and creative ideas - is fashioned in the most peculiar artistic forms. It is also an exalted cry from the depths:
Mimaamakim k'raticha Hashem11
but not a raw shapeless howl - our voices are tuned to the frequency of Jewish Tradition, Torah and Halachah.
Avant-garde mingles with sonnets, free verse dances next to haiku, stories follow myths, fantasies and recollections, speculation and experience, whispers and outcries -
as the flow from the depths of authors' consciousness is unveiled to the reader, and through the sea gates of Tradition, enter the shapes of Artistic Expressions of the Jewish Religious Experience.
Jake Marmer
15 Tammuz, 5762
1 - Author thanks Rabbi Zalman Paris for his support and assistance in writing of this essay.
2 - From a letter to E.P. Ivanov (September 3rd, 1909).
3 - The Surrealist Manifesto (1924).
4 - From “Basho on Poetry.”
5 - Kabalistic work of sixteenth century.
6 - And if you say that His force is beyond limits and not within limits, you take away from His completeness.
7 - Pirkey Avot 6:2
8 - The ideas cited here come from both the interview, published in this issue, and R’Wolf’s book, “Practical Kabbalah”
9 - Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi, author of Tanya, a major work of Chassidut.
10 - And Adam knew his wife, Eve [in the Biblical sense] (Genesis 4:1).
11 - From the depths, I call to Hashem (Psalms 130:1).
|